|
|
142.
購買力 |
2016-07-23 14:47 |
|
引刀是按自己購買力來評估樓價走勢,QE 的鈔票未能進入引刀這種人口袋,所以覺得樓價升唔合理.
|
|
|
|
144.
小師妹 |
2016-07-23 15:44 |
|
Seems rather to be Delusional disorder:- Delusional disorder, previously called paranoid disorder, is a type of serious mental illness called a "psychosis" in which a person cannot tell what is real from what is imagined. The main feature of this disorder is the presence of delusions, unshakable beliefs in something untrue or not based on reality. People with delusional disorder generally experience non-bizarre delusions, which involve situations that could occur in real life, such as being followed, poisoned, deceived, conspired against, or loved from a distance. These delusions usually involve the misinterpretation of perceptions or experiences. In reality, however, the situations are either not true at all or highly exaggerated. If the delusions could not happen in reality (aliens, television broadcasting your thoughts) then a person might be considered delusional with bizarre-type delusions. People with delusional disorder often can continue to socialize and function normally, apart from the subject of their delusion, and generally do not behave in an obviously odd or bizarre manner. This is unlike people with otherpsychotic disorders, who also might have delusions as a symptom of their disorder. In some cases, however, people with delusional disorder might become so preoccupied with their delusions that their lives are disrupted.
|
|
145.
144樓 小師妹 |
2016-07-23 17:22 |
|
明白晒 Delusional disorder 的定義;這種患者有時(但不多)在某些領域能夠獨當一面,與眾不同。例如真人真事電影改編:有你終生美麗 A Beautiful Mind (Oscar winner of 4 Academy Awards),所描述的男主角一樣,在另一方面,卻又可以獲得The Nobel Prize for Mathematics. 我們這裡也有一位人兄,據自稱是獲得 BSc in Agriculture,不知是否在學術研習時獲得此上天厚愛?更加不知他現在是否還 Engaged in Agriculture? 請即欣賞完整免費電影版本: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zskVcFJ86o4
|
|
146.
歷史長河 |
|
2016-07-23 21:51 |
|
John Nash was an mathematician but the Nobel prize he won was economic science for his contributions to game theory.
|
|
147.
多謝長河先生指正 |
2016-07-23 22:46 |
|
真係唔好意思搞錯咗,原來是諾貝爾獎經濟學獎。
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Forbes_Nash_Jr.
|
|
148.
問亮劍 |
2016-07-23 23:34 |
|
你地係咪私底下有whatsapp或 wechat group之類, 可否加我?謝謝
|
|
|
劍兄,我在這網站雖然不久,但亦非常欣賞您的見解,謝謝!
|
|
150.
ivan |
2016-07-24 10:36 |
|
你地係咪私底下有whatsapp或 wechat group之類, 可否加我 (ivanlai.14@gmail.com)?謝謝
|
|
151.
初哥業主 |
2016-07-24 11:34 |
|
原來講少少感受,又唔係叫人哋買樓,只係表達一般市民面對現實生活的做法,咁都會受到質疑丶批評。引刀大俠的手段,小弟是領教到了,再會。
|
|
152.
引刀一快 |
|
2016-07-24 13:29 |
|
妄想樓市只上不下,果D就係妄想症,睇嚟144樓係講緊LYC兄。
|
|
153.
引刀一快 |
|
2016-07-24 13:36 |
|
“ 即09年3月到呢家,CCL「只是」由约 60 點升到呢家近 130 點,其實每年的複式增長得 11.1%咋,呢度可能只係反映緊現金因各國量化寬鬆而損失的購買力。”
大陸呢幾年薪水約摸升一倍,樓市都擺明泡沫,香港呢?
|
|
154.
引刀一快 |
|
2016-07-24 13:39 |
|
|
155.
實話實說 |
2016-07-24 14:44 |
|
引刀兄弟,從香港樓市近一百年到依家嘅價錢走勢睇,又從100年前一兩萬蚊一間屋到依家要四五百萬一間屋嘅現實情況嚟睇,咁樣唔叫只升不跌長升長有又叫乜呢?
引刀兄弟如果亂咁否定事實,指鹿為馬亂咁嚟,好難唔得罪呢度啲社會精英,變成過街傻佬人人喊打就係一個必然嘅事件。
|
|
156.
萬花筒 |
2016-07-24 15:20 |
|
To:153
薪水升跌和樓市泡沫無必然成正比的關係,簡單從兩方面來說;
1)樓市主力參與者不少係大投資者和大老闆, 樓市價錢升定跌主要係由這班人決定, 如果打工仔人工升, 推出市面的樓會多一點, 如果人工跌, 推出市面的樓就會少一點, 樓價基本係長線只升不跌的,但供應量就會隨市民薪酬改變調整,
2)通脹一向比人工更能刺激樓價上升, 港元購買力平均每年持續下降15% 至20%, 遠遠比政府公佈數字為高, 稍為有理智有能力的人都會買樓抗通脹, 人們不是常常說"十年黃金變爛銅"嗎, 但我會說"十年港元變廢紙"了, 雖然講得有點誇張, 但也離事實不遠了.
|
|
|
其實引刀在這裡混了這麽久,究竟識吾識樓嫁。連港樓無泡沫都吾知?究竟知吾知港樓六成以上供完,新做按揭成數低係咩意思呀?唉!呢種人真係好難頂,吾識野又要扮識,衰左又吾認錯。
|
|
158.
引刀一快 |
|
2016-07-24 17:55 |
|
To 155樓
100年?又用100年?呵呵
係咪淨係樓升其他唔升?係咪中間冇跌過?100年前用緊邉隻貨幣?大洋?
精英?我最唔信就係呢味嘢,呢句夠得罪未?
|
|
159.
引刀一快 |
|
2016-07-24 18:24 |
|
To 156樓 萬花筒
1,香港嘅通脹,主因係大陸通脹,你睇睇日本雜誌嘅標價幾多年冇升過吖,咪同我講係因為印刷技術提升呀。
2,十年黃金變廢銅,係因為唔做買賣啫,97-2003,物業買賣得宜嘅人一樣賺錢。 主張只買不賣嘅人,係組織力量囤貨,當中咩人可以脫穎而出,大家自己估量。 或者樓係可以壟斷嘅,但係香港未來變成點就絕對係變數。
|
|
160.
日出東方維我引刀不敗 |
2016-07-24 19:26 |
|
霸氣!好!己有傳奇刀法絕世高手"無敵"既風彩,就差"殺妻求道"呢一關要過,就可以修成正果,入得青山鳥!
|
|