地產論壇
登入名稱
密碼
頁數:
給香港政府的信
瀏覽人次:25581    回應:11
給香港政府的信
 
Alan Pepper
2019年8月10日
A friend of mine suggested that China’s interest in HK is their way to get the money out of the system, not the interest for the HK people. Although I cannot agree with this, as I believe China’s interest is the long term prosperity of both HK and China. Nevertheless I cannot disagree that some interests of some people are certainly neglected.

These interests differ from people and groups. The government should identify these interests and decide which ones can be addressed and which ones cannot. For those interested that cannot, it seemed to me the current HK government is not politically sensitive enough to judge and identify. 

And for those interests that can be addressed, the ones I’m more interested about as a HK citizen, the current HK government seems reluctant to address them with resolute determination, and is quick to fall back on an easy excuse, that the opposition parties are hindering their progress. 

Whether the government is powerless, or intentionally reluctant I don’t have an answer, but nevertheless without a resolute determination on addressing these issues, HK does not have a fighting chance of a peaceful future. However, and unfortunately, a peaceful future does not necessarily correlate with a prosperous future in this city’s development. I’m afraid we will have to accept this contradicting but coexisting lifestyle in the years to come.
給香港政府的信
2. 香港是我家
2019-08-10 20:46
給政府建議……
1. 回應訴求: 人口政策
減少150配額,要嚴格審批,專才50; 精英50; 投資增就業50
2. 回應訴求: 房屋分配
改建工廈租給青年作coliving and coworking space. 
3. 回應訴求: 執法管理公開文化汚染,如公園賣唱賣色、走水貨……
4. 回應訴求: 增加公職人員操手透明度,包括議員收入及支出
5. 回應訴求: 公營房屋優先計劃,如考慮居港15年以上,年長者優先
希望政府了解市民真正的訴求
3. 乜春
2019-08-10 21:18
R U B B I S H
4. Sugar
2019-08-10 22:54
Thank you for your brave words Alan, esp in a time of turmoil in HK...
5. Sugar
2019-08-10 23:27
3/F Mr.乜春,

Excuse me sir,I think it's a bit irrational n impolite to someone who loves HK n dares to raise voice against the DARK side of our society

Btw what exactly are u accusing Alan,if any?
8. Alan Pepper
2019-08-11 13:55
To 2.

這些全部是有建設性的訴求,政府需要考慮及研究這些能否做到, 已盡力執行。

不過考慮同研究唔好拖太久,唔好再整個乜乜小組研究兩年,才發覺自己冇做過野

用心解決能解決的問題,起碼可以輓回多少民望。

To 3

I will assume you’re referring to the HK government, not my article. Which I cannot agree entirely. But there is lots of room for improvement, much like any individual or organization. There’s a positive way and a negative way to approach most any situations. 
9. Alan Pepper
2019-08-11 13:56
To 2.

這些全部是有建設性的訴求,政府需要考慮及研究這些能否做到, 《而》盡力執行。

不過考慮同研究唔好拖太久,唔好再整個乜乜小組研究兩年,才發覺自己冇做過野

用心解決能解決的問題,起碼可以輓回多少民望。

To 3

I will assume you’re referring to the HK government, not my article. Which I cannot agree entirely. But there is lots of room for improvement, much like any individual or organization. There’s a positive way and a negative way to approach most any situations. 
10. 望東樓
2019-08-11 14:20
If you wanna please everybody, you pleased nobody. 

不過都可以合理咁解釋到點解班小哥玩焦土玩得咁開心。

感覺上三樓好似講緊二樓,呵呵。
11. 出前一丁
2019-08-11 16:05
此時此刻,边個想香港死; 边個想香港好!大家心照,天理循環,報應不爽。
12. 八十後小蟲
2019-08-11 17:08
政府肯聽就係

多謝亞倫
13. 路過
2019-08-12 06:02
感謝筆者理性分析,不過我覺得政府再唔改善效率同部門之間既互相溝通,香港遲早會比依個團隊整冧
14. 引刀一快
2019-08-13 10:39
To 2樓

專才50、精英50,仲死,你信唔信?
頁數:
我要回應
我的稱呼
回應 / 意見
驗証文字
 
回應 / 留言規則
  1. 禁止撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論;
  2. 禁止以名稱/暱稱/綽號/同音字等批評或映射任何人士、機構、公司;
  3. 禁止發佈有關招聘、推銷、廣告等內容;
  4. 禁止公開任何個人資料(如電話號碼、電郵地址、即時通訊帳號等)。

敬請留言者自律。本網站保留刪除/堵截任何留言的權利。

聲 明

所有議題/文章由其作者提供,大部份回應/留言是即時上載,少部份未註冊為會員的回應/留言會經我們的系統過濾,所有議題/文章/回應/ 留言/資訊及評論並不代表地產資訊網(Property.hk)立場和觀點。由於本【地產論壇】受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察 所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,歡迎以留言或電郵方式與我們聯絡(admin@property.hk),我們有權刪除/堵截任何留言 (刪除/堵截留言前不會作事先警告及通知), 如有任何爭議,本網站管理員擁有最終的詮釋權 。